fulltimestudent,
Boyarin’s book “The Jewish Gospels: The Story of the Jewish Christ” poses challenges and each needs to be tested.
His dominant themes, as far as I can make out, are that the term “Son of God” comes from the anointing (Messiah/Christ) of King David, whereas the term “Son of Man” derives from the divine figure at Daniel 7. For Boyarin, therefore, “Son of God” refers to Jesus’ humanity whereas “Son of Man” refers to his perceived divinity.
He correctly writes: “Oceans of ink and forests of trees have given their substance so that humans could continue to argue about where the term ‘Son of Man’ came from and what it means”. And Boyarin’s is an added voice.
I am not saying whether I am necessarily in agreement with him or not; I need to examine every instance where these expressions are employed by NT writers and come to my own conclusion. Comments by his supporters and critics will also need to be studied. His ideas need to be seriously examined.
I am interested to know what your research reveals, remembering that as you seek opinions, that people are prone to defend their previous conclusions.
I produced a bullet-point summary Chapter 1 of Boyarin’s book for myself. You are most welcome to it; I provide my email address in my studies.
Doug